You’re calling a well-documented and cited debunking of the naive assumption that unprovoked assault on strangers expressing harmful/extremist views is an effective tool against the spread of those views a “rant”, because you’re absolutely desperate to classify the threat to your narrative it as an irrational/emotional response, so you can then rationalize ignoring the inconvenient truth.
It’s literally what they want. If you do this, you are their ally. That’s the reality.
You’re calling a well-documented and cited debunking
Absolutely none of your (supposedly) “well-documented” peace-police bullcrap can hide the actual truth.
Do tell… why is all your sources so obsessed with protecting the feels of neo-nazis, eh? Do any of these sources of yours show the same kind of concern with how dystopian capitalism “plays” into the hands of leftists, or how white supremacist violence “plays” into the hands of movements like antifa or BLM?
You’re calling a well-documented and cited debunking of the naive assumption that unprovoked assault on strangers expressing harmful/extremist views is an effective tool against the spread of those views a “rant”, because you’re absolutely desperate to classify the threat to your narrative it as an irrational/emotional response, so you can then rationalize ignoring the inconvenient truth.
It’s literally what they want. If you do this, you are their ally. That’s the reality.
Absolutely none of your (supposedly) “well-documented” peace-police bullcrap can hide the actual truth.
Do tell… why is all your sources so obsessed with protecting the feels of neo-nazis, eh? Do any of these sources of yours show the same kind of concern with how dystopian capitalism “plays” into the hands of leftists, or how white supremacist violence “plays” into the hands of movements like antifa or BLM?
No?
I wonder why that is, liberal?