• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    It’s not a suggestion for an alternative. Sideloading is not even blocked: unblocked apps remain sideloadable. Sideloading is not “fucking anti-property-rights loaded language” & the word existed a while before Android OS.

    They’re just being uninformed drama-queens as usual.

    • sexhaver87@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      It is a fairly loaded word, implying it’s an alternative method of loading data to the primary, more actively vendor-supported method. Those methods you previously mentioned are actively subverting the primary application install methods (Google Play) and are 1 minor software update from being completely axed. Name-calling an opposing “they” is not quite productive.

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Name-calling an opposing “they”

        “They” is now a dirty word?

        Sideload wasn’t loaded language before Android OS and still isn’t: it’s a bogus, overreactive claim.

        All of them are valid install methods. Developers will always need a way to load their experimental apps not yet suitable for release: they won’t block the methods they need to do that.

        Clear use cases for casual users exist for

        • deterring them from installing software by bad actors that’s known to be malicious
        • verifying non-malicious software hasn’t been modified possibly maliciously before installing it.

        “They” are drama-queens, because despite legitimate use cases to address actual problems posing high-cost risks to users (even as Google turns out to be a shitty authority) & clear documentation that power users can still install any package they want, they choose to catastrophize.