• ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    The problem is that the RAW implies only things considered creatures caught in the area take damage.

    That would also mean Fireball only does damage to creatures, and everything else is just ignited and only if they’re flammable? Worst game ever.

    Edit: Wait a minute. Player Handbook, Chapter 8

    Characters can also damage objects with their weapons and spells. Objects are immune to poison and psychic damage, but otherwise they can be affected by physical and magical attacks much like creatures can.

    Am I missing something here? Why isn’t Prismatic Wall affected? Are walls not objects?

    DMG, page 246 mentions walls specifically:

    Use common sense when determining a character’s success at damaging an object. Can a fighter cut through a section of a stone wall with a sword? No, the sword is likely to break before the wall does.

    Common sense, my worst nemesis 😔

    • cjoll4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m going to preface this by saying I am 100% in favor of using common sense, and I have always allowed players to damage objects with spells as long as it makes sense. For example, I probably wouldn’t let a player “inflict wounds” on a locked door, but I would happily let them “thunderous smite” it.

      But in the spirit of this thread, if we’re applying a rigidly narrow interpretation of the rules as written, a spell only does what its description says it does. Cone of Cold does not say it damages objects. It says it damages creatures that fail a saving throw.

      Yes, Chapter 8 says “Characters can also damage objects with their weapons and spells” - and indeed they can, if they use a suitable spell such as Fire Bolt or Shatter which can damage objects according to its spell description.

      Again, that’s Rules Lawyer Jesse Pinkman talking, and does not represent my own beliefs or opinions.