I’m not building any metaphor. I explained to you in very simple terms that the policies democrats actively chose to pursue resulted in Trump being elected. Evidently you’re still struggling with understanding this. Let me know what part you need explained in more detail. I didn’t imply anything. I was very clear in what I said.
The only one doing deflection here is you by bringing up what Trump is doing now. We all know what he’s doing, the question burgerlanders need to be asking themselves is how their country evolved to the stage where people like Trump are in power.
Maybe lay off chatgpt there and actually try actually reading what is being said to you.
I understood that perfectly. No, you are not “building a metaphor”, as you put it. What you are doing is building an argumentwith metaphor. And I explained in great detail, with quotes, how yes you are absolutely 100% building an argument with metaphor. What this current reply still fails to do, is address any of the points I laid out in a numbered list, or respond the points I was making about the OP’s article that you didn’t bother to read.
I’ve explicitly and repeatedly told you that I am not building any metaphor. You continue to ignore what is being said to you in order to keep building your straw man.
I’m not building any metaphor. I explained to you in very simple terms that the policies democrats actively chose to pursue resulted in Trump being elected. Evidently you’re still struggling with understanding this. Let me know what part you need explained in more detail. I didn’t imply anything. I was very clear in what I said.
The only one doing deflection here is you by bringing up what Trump is doing now. We all know what he’s doing, the question burgerlanders need to be asking themselves is how their country evolved to the stage where people like Trump are in power.
Maybe lay off chatgpt there and actually try actually reading what is being said to you.
I understood that perfectly. No, you are not “building a metaphor”, as you put it. What you are doing is building an argument with metaphor. And I explained in great detail, with quotes, how yes you are absolutely 100% building an argument with metaphor. What this current reply still fails to do, is address any of the points I laid out in a numbered list, or respond the points I was making about the OP’s article that you didn’t bother to read.
I’ve explicitly and repeatedly told you that I am not building any metaphor. You continue to ignore what is being said to you in order to keep building your straw man.