• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    Its literally driven by economics and practicality. People dont buy them because its cheaper and more convenient to use battery-electric.

    If there had been a huge green hydrogen build out earlier, it might have been different, but it isn’t

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      The case for H2 is just to make it (electrolysis). The case for consumer FCEVs comes well after the production capacity is abundant, but then also after heavier transport refueling is deployed sufficiently.

      • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        Also to compress it, chill it, transport it, and store it, while avoiding leaks and fires. You’re absolutely right though, first comes renewables (and a shit ton of batteries), hopefully in parallel some green steel and chemical processes, then heavy transit and the harder edge cases to electrify, assuming electrification hasn’t already solved those issues by then. Talking about regular folks buying fuel cell cars is not realistic.

    • Hypx@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      That is the exact opposite of reality. BEVs are heavily subsidized globally. Without enormous government support, the market for them would be very small.