• calliope@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Indeed, chaps by definition have no ass.

    They’re assless pants, really.

    Tangentially, I hate it that pulling someone’s pants down became popular and was called “pantsing.” You’re not putting pants ON the person…

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      My (completely un-researched, straight from my ass) hypothesis is that the term comes from British English and not American English. In the UK “pants” are your underwear, so “pansting” somebody is exposing their underwear.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I hate it that pulling someone’s pants down became popular and was called “pantsing.” You’re not putting pants ON the person…

      Do you feel similarly about shelling peanuts?

      • calliope@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh excellent point, I hadn’t thought about it.

        I think it’s different for parts of living things.

        Shelling is removing the entire shell. “Peeling” something doesn’t mean adding peel, and “pitting” means removing the pit.

        However, for bodies, removing skin in general is “skinning,” but if you lose the skin of just your hand it’s called de-gloving. Removing the bowels isn’t called “boweling,” but “disembowling.”

        If I said someone did a “shirting,” maybe I’m weird but I’d think of getting hit with a shirt before removing someone’s shirt. And in hockey, a “jerseying” is more about pulling the jersey over the head than removing it.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Removing the bowels isn’t called “boweling,” but “disembowling.”

          But the synonymous process of removing the guts is called gutting.

          • calliope@retrolemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s true, but I would argue “gut” is more colloquial.

            Like, to “behead” someone means to remove their head, but it’s also colloquial. Whereas decapitation is the more medical term.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Should it be de-pantsing, or disempantsing, then? I think it’d be the former, but I want it to be the latter

          • calliope@retrolemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think most people would say “de-pants” but I agree with you that it SHOULD be disempantsing.

            Though I’m worried the “em” implies the pants are being extracted.

            “Dis-pantsing” is also really good though. Then when it happens people can be like “Jimmy got a dis-pants-ation”