- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Police records and witness accounts from a Chicago suburb where a man was fatally shot by a federal immigration enforcement agent earlier this month complicate the picture of the event presented by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which said the agent fired his weapon after the man drove his vehicle toward agents.
Silverio Villegas Gonzalez, 38, was pulled over and eventually shot by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent in Franklin Park, Illinois on September 12, just after dropping off his two children at Passow Elementary School and Small World Learning Center, a daycare located blocks away from the incident.
Bodycam footage, which Reuters obtained on Tuesday, captures an interview with the truck driver, named in police records as Josue Hernandez-Rodriguez.
“He was trying to escape from them,” Hernandez-Rodriguez said.
In multiple statements, DHS has said the agent, who has not been identified, responded with lethal force because he was “fearing for his own life.” But in bodycam footage, the agent, in a bullet-resistant police vest and torn jeans, described his injuries as “nothing major.”
A lot of American cops will shoot you if you drive away while they’re half-inside your vehicle, or even if they’re somewhere vaguely in path of where you’re driving it, because that’s an action that can potentially kill or fatally injure them.
Not to give ICE a pass on killing this guy. His death should be felony murder for them, because they never should have been there in the first place, because they shouldn’t be wandering around disguising their identities snatching up random people and sending them to whatever global prison they want to with no due process. I don’t really know what any random civilian is supposed to do if ICE is putting them in fear for their safety by cosplaying as law enforcement. I’m just saying that shooting him because he stepped on the gas isn’t the part of it that is fucked.
is doing a lot of heavy lifting. It’s hard to understand what happened from their description.
I read it as the guy leaning in the window, then the car driving away and the guy no longer being in his original location (meaning he was traveling with the car at that point). Maybe I’m wrong, but that’s how it sounds to me and it doesn’t seem that Reuters would have any reason to lie or phrase things misleadingly about what was in the surveillance video they saw.
Although I think they’re writing is accidentally vague in this line, Reuters absolutely has adjusted things in the past, especially their headlines.
Regardless, you saying this means we’re going off of opinions:
When did this happen? I generally trust Reuters, if they’re being dishonest I definitely would appreciate knowing about it.
You’re going to have to go through reuters every day to figure that out for yourself. I generally trust them about 90%. They’re one of the best, but still not great.
They’re owned by Canadian billionaires, so their priorities are a bit different. But still, billionaires.
💲 Reuters
◾ Owned by the Thomson family, the wealthiest family in Canada.
◾ CEO is Steve Hasker
Source
Here are a lot of the major media owners from before the election last year. I’m sure some of them have changed a little: https://sh.itjust.works/post/20890256