cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agoLinux Userslemmy.mlimagemessage-square148fedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down126cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageLinux Userslemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square148fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareaeharding@vger.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up34·1 month agoThe number of people who don’t reverse-I-search is too damn high
minus-squareulterno@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoIt was quite a while before I realised that was possible. Then not long after starting to use it, that I got fed up and just started opening up the history file and searching in it.
minus-squaredropcase@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agowhy not history | grep -i and the search term? even if there are several, you can use ! and the command’s line number to run it again
minus-squareulterno@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agohistory is shell dependent.
The number of people who don’t reverse-I-search is too damn high
CTRL+R for those unitiated
reverse-i-search + fzf = <3
It was quite a while before I realised that was possible.
Then not long after starting to use it, that I got fed up and just started opening up the history file and searching in it.
why not
history | grep -iand the search term?even if there are several, you can use ! and the command’s line number to run it again
historyis shell dependent.