I totally agree with that, and actually think arguments (any work, especially intellectual) can have it’s own intrinsic value despite originating from dogshit human.
I was given some shit about this over the years, but I stand by it (unless it harms other people, trauma is real).
arguments (any work, especially intellectual) can have it’s own intrinsic value despite originating from dogshit human.
Absolutely. Dogshit people can still say something I can agree with and I don’t think there is anything wrong with taking that position. Some people automatically disagree with a point just because it comes out the mouth of a person they don’t like, and that feels closed minded; a broken clock is still right twice a day I suppose.
I totally agree with that, and actually think arguments (any work, especially intellectual) can have it’s own intrinsic value despite originating from dogshit human.
I was given some shit about this over the years, but I stand by it (unless it harms other people, trauma is real).
This just isn’t the same as praising that person.
Absolutely. Dogshit people can still say something I can agree with and I don’t think there is anything wrong with taking that position. Some people automatically disagree with a point just because it comes out the mouth of a person they don’t like, and that feels closed minded; a broken clock is still right twice a day I suppose.
That said fuck Charlie Kirk.
Yes.
I mean, a random character generator can have the best idea.
Humans can literally make a mistake in pronunciation & make a good point.
I’m sure parrots had original sayings better than a lot of humans.