• rchive@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Public services aren’t efficient, but they can surely change themselves more efficiently than they can force a multi billion dollar company to change its ways.

    I’m surprised you’re not more worried about the government outsourcing its functions to a company you seem very suspicious of.

    If the government decided to have vital public meetings only in a private venue you have to be a member of or something, the proper fix is not to force the club to accept everyone, it’s to have the government stop having vital meetings in private places.

    I also don’t see a problem because everything of value these video streaming services offer is replaceable by one of the many other streaming services. The fact that YouTube is the biggest or most recognized does not change anything for me. The fact that there is some content that is only on YouTube doesn’t, either. That’s a normal thing that happens in an economy. Ford dealers only sell Ford cars, Coca Cola doesn’t sell Pepsi, etc.

    • qfjp@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Public services aren’t efficient, but they can surely change themselves more efficiently than they can force a multi billion dollar company to change its ways.

      [citation needed]

      I’m surprised you’re not more worried about the government outsourcing its functions to a company you seem very suspicious of.

      You’re the one talking about all the alternate video services you use. I just dont want a monopoly.

      If the government decided to have vital public meetings only in a private venue you have to be a member of or something, the proper fix is not to force the club to accept everyone, it’s to have the government stop having vital meetings in private places.

      wut. Not having meetings in private places literally is making sure the ‘place’ accepts everyone. Do you even read what you’re saying?

      I also don’t see a problem because everything of value these video streaming services offer is replaceable by one of the many other streaming services. The fact that YouTube is the biggest or most recognized does not change anything for me. The fact that there is some content that is only on YouTube doesn’t, either.

      Well, you totally missed the point then.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just dont want a monopoly.

        There is no monopoly in video streaming. Not even close.

        wut. Not having meetings in private places literally is making sure the ‘place’ accepts everyone. Do you even read what you’re saying?

        You’re misreading what I wrote. If government unfairly has vital meetings at Private Club which not everyone has access to, the solution is not to force Private Club to accept everyone, it’s to not have meetings at Private Club and have them at City Hall or something instead, somewhere that isn’t exclusive.

        • qfjp@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no monopoly in video streaming. Not even close.

          Ah, you’re one of those people. Okay.