• Susaga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yes, it would have meaning, but less.

    Jesus christ, you’re having more delusions than AI. Do you honestly think anyone would care about a picture of some text they agree with so much that the rug pull will affect them in any meaningful way? Do you think that guy hitting refresh on his prompt generator is putting in meaningful effort? Do you think anyone but AI chuds will excuse the blatantly obvious flaws the way you guys do?

    Even at this second, I can’t even remember what the image looks like. It doesn’t mean anything to me. I just agree with the words.

    I’m sure your little fiction brings you comfort, but it’s just fiction.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It doesn’t mean anything to me. I just agree with the words.

      … the words are its meaning.

      Those words say: flaws are fine, for anything done by hand.

      If Fountain was an off-the-shelf urinal, would you go crack it with a hammer? That’s how people genuinely talk about generated images. They latch onto terms like intent and declare the robot cannot provide it, therefore, some image they quite enjoyed is now a useless husk. As if they can delete the emotional response from their brain.

      Like a clever visual metaphor doesn’t parse, if it was rendered instead of scribbled.