• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    But does the JPEG have Buddha nature?

    Sorry, taking this seriously. So… if I use their tool… and enter a lurid combination of popular cartoon characters, morally indefensible fetishes, and prominent political figures… it’s their fault. They made that art. The image you closed immediately but cannot unsee, contains absolutely none of my meaning. It is immaculate of my intent, and I cannot be blamed.

    No matter how many hours I spent getting Frieren’s spit to land in Starmer’s ear.

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      If they created the ai to be capable of producing that sort of image then yes. They curated the ai, they gave it the data that allowed it to produce that. You can’t train an ai on, as a random example, exclusively traditonal oil paints pre 2000 and have it make porn of frieren. They would have to intentionally give it that capability. Should they have given it that ability, doesn’t it say something about their intent and meaning in constructing the ai? Isn’t it purposeful on their part?

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Models from last year can render characters introduced this year. If you can describe their appearance - the robot will draw that. Maybe not easily. Maybe not well. But combining abstracted concepts is kinda the point.

        It is difficult to imagine an image model that can’t emit basically whatever you want. If the model has people, it has everybody. You just have to find them.