• Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    The funny thing about TVs like that…the picture was large, but it was also bad. It was still 480i NTSC television from cable, satellite or a laserdisc at best, or a VHS cassette at worst. They could actually have viable speakers in them though.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      Plus these things used a fresnel lens to make the image as big as it was, which meant that you had to sit in exactly the right spot to be able to even see anything. It’s like how VR headsets are blurry and dim if you’re not wearing them properly; same issue with these TVs.

      And then there’s the fact that they would get dimmer and dimmer over time (within 5-10 years), which surely didn’t help matters much. Honestly you were much better off with a CRT over one of these old rear-projection TVs back in the day.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The viewing angles werent that bad. Honestly better than even a modern LCD TN panel. Also, only the newer lcd projectors had the dimming issues. Older models were 3 crts in a trench coat. They have a whole suite of issues on their own.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        You guys sound like David Silver from 90210. Can’t remember the episode, but the gang plays poker in a beach club house or something and Silver geeks out about back projection TVs

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The later widescreen big box TVs were good enough, especially if they had HDMI, VGA, or at least component video hookups for 720p HD.

        You wouldn’t want an older 480i rear projection like the ones we’re talking about for XBOX 360. You wouldn’t be able to see shit and text would be unreadable. The 360 was best experienced on HDTVs released in the 2000s.

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Late models could do 1080i. And quality wise were better than lcds from that era. but iirc, after 2002, most models switched from CRT projecter to lcds and high powered lamps that are bad about dimming in age. So peak RPTV era is late 90s and very early 2ks. But even then, they tended to have ghosting and alignment issues… so…

          • Psythik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            37 minutes ago

            They could do both, but most enthusiasts at the time preferred 720p because it technically showed more pixels on the screen at any given moment in time, and didn’t flicker the screen. Personally I used 1080i anyway cause it looked better to me at the time, even knowing its limitations. Either way I’m glad that we have zero compromise 4K now.

        • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I had one of these monstrosities for a week. Got her on freecycle. Took up half my living room. Was six feet wide and three feet deep. And yes, it was blurry as fuck but godsdammit my screen took up the whole damn room for a week and it was fun as hell before we gave her away on freecycle and promised I my wife to stop getting free TVs.