• Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Communism is not, by definition, authoritarian rule. Sure, a lot of examples exist where that’s the case, but that’s only because anything less couldn’t withstand the CIA starting a coup. It isn’t required, but you need something strong to resist anti-leftist governments doing everything they can to overthrow you.

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Which is really fun because in creating the authoritarian state you’ve undermined communism in ideology and remain as such in name only.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The USSR did exist “in spite of the CIA” and look how well that went.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, after WWII they had to maintain a strict authoritarian rule to root out traitors and espionage and even still it eventually got beaten.

        You do realize that the argument you are making is “rich bullies will always ruin attempts at socialism so we should just let those rich bullies have all the power because at least we’re not being oppressed by a government”

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          All the other countries faced similar challenges, and despite that they didn’t all turn violent dictatorships. You just try to blame all the horrors of communism in the twentieth century on others.