You’re overcomplicating your reply and it doesn’t make it look any smarter.
You cant force a solution in a math question from the question, and also have the question not be trivial, do you actually have any experience in using higher level maths or are you speaking out of your ass like the guy i was replying to originally
You cant force a solution in a math question from the question
That’s not generally true. That’s entirely dependent on the question and whoever designed it. Solve for x in Ax = b can be solved a metric fuckton of ways. Solve for x in Ax = b using Gaussian elimination is solvable in much fewer, often one, way. That’s just a trivial example but the idea that you can’t both force a solution and have a non-trivial question is demonstrably false to anyone with experience.
You’re overcomplicating your reply and it doesn’t make it look any smarter.
Ah, so now length is the crime and experience is the verdict? Fascinating. Meanwhile, the logical contradiction in your own position remains completely untouched. I have a master’s degree in ML/AI so I actually have quite a lot of experience in mathematics.
Do you actually have any experience in working in academics, or are you just ‘speaking out of your ass’? It’s not particularly relevant, either way. Your position would be more in-place at a high-school geometry class than in a genuine collegiate setting, let alone in academia or industry research.
You’re overcomplicating your reply and it doesn’t make it look any smarter.
You cant force a solution in a math question from the question, and also have the question not be trivial, do you actually have any experience in using higher level maths or are you speaking out of your ass like the guy i was replying to originally
That’s not generally true. That’s entirely dependent on the question and whoever designed it. Solve for x in Ax = b can be solved a metric fuckton of ways. Solve for x in Ax = b using Gaussian elimination is solvable in much fewer, often one, way. That’s just a trivial example but the idea that you can’t both force a solution and have a non-trivial question is demonstrably false to anyone with experience.
Ah, so now length is the crime and experience is the verdict? Fascinating. Meanwhile, the logical contradiction in your own position remains completely untouched. I have a master’s degree in ML/AI so I actually have quite a lot of experience in mathematics.
Do you actually have any experience in working in academics, or are you just ‘speaking out of your ass’? It’s not particularly relevant, either way. Your position would be more in-place at a high-school geometry class than in a genuine collegiate setting, let alone in academia or industry research.