Got it, thank you so much! I agree with your statement regarding the bark as I was looking at the photos from Wikipedia.
I’m delighted to see that iNaturalist works on birds as well; my references are mostly books and journals with questionable illustrations and photographs.
I use iNaturalist but it’s pretty hit or miss (the bark thing is one kind of mistake I see it make frequently).
Got it, thank you so much! I agree with your statement regarding the bark as I was looking at the photos from Wikipedia.
I’m delighted to see that iNaturalist works on birds as well; my references are mostly books and journals with questionable illustrations and photographs.
Thank you so much, you’re lovely!