Got banned from [email protected] for pointing out that it was a big reach to say that wind power is included in the term “solar energy”. The mod referenced a temp ban from two years ago? Tried to say I’ve got a “history” of trolling and harassment, as well that I “doxxed” user DMs which also happened two years ago. I even, at the time, talked with the mod involved and reposted that comment without the DM screenshots. Like I don’t have an entirely squeaky clean modlog but it’s only a single page over two years? What the fluff? Like it’s a two week ban and I could hardly care but jeeze this feels like overreach.

https://slrpnk.net/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=518329

  • Blaze@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    They clarified their position in the comment below

    The comment reported in this post has been restored

    though I’ll admit I don’t have the receipts right now

    For someone complaining that they use “you are Universal Monk" to ban you, that seems a bit ironic to make such statements without anything to back it up.

    • UniversalMonk@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      As for me not having receipts right now, I wasn’t trying to prove anything. Just saying that it seems I have read things about slpnk not being as cool as it used to be. I mean, we are here talking about them in this comm because of it.

      Others in this thread are saying that OP’s situation was PTB as well, and based on the upvotes of my comments, I’m not the only one who thinks the slrpnk vibe seems to have changed lately.

      I’m not a mod or admin who banned anyone in this thread, so no reason for me to have any receipts. I was just giving my personal opinion.

      I’m glad OP’s comment was restored.

      • Blaze@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Making this kind of statements without receipts tends to be called out, as it’s very easy to just claim anything about anyone.

        • UniversalMonk@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          How? I said I think that slrpnk has lost it’s way. That was my personal opinion.

          Want a quick receipt? This very thread. Most people agreed with OP and felt it was PTB against a slrpnk mod.

            • UniversalMonk@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I’m glad the ban got reverted. But it wasn’t reversed until it was posted here. I don’t have to give receipts on my personal opinions since I didn’t start the thread.

              Let’s move on to other things since the ban was reversed.

              • Blaze@lazysoci.al
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                You could edit your top comment following the evolution of the situation. That way people who read this thread in the future will have a more accurate idea of slrpnk.net

                • UniversalMonk@anarchist.nexus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  I won’t be editing it, because I’m still of the same personal opinion that I offered. I can have my own personal opinion, without receipts, even if you don’t agree with my opinions.

                  I didn’t start the thread, I’m not a subject of OP’s complaint, and again, the mere fact that OP had to come here in the first place, backs up my personal opinion.

                  You don’t agree. Ok, cool. I haven’t changed my mind. Let’s move on.