Got banned from [email protected] for pointing out that it was a big reach to say that wind power is included in the term “solar energy”. The mod referenced a temp ban from two years ago? Tried to say I’ve got a “history” of trolling and harassment, as well that I “doxxed” user DMs which also happened two years ago. I even, at the time, talked with the mod involved and reposted that comment without the DM screenshots. Like I don’t have an entirely squeaky clean modlog but it’s only a single page over two years? What the fluff? Like it’s a two week ban and I could hardly care but jeeze this feels like overreach.

https://slrpnk.net/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=518329

  • lividweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 days ago

    Like another poster said, oil is rotten plants, which grew from solar energy, so oil=solar.

    Nuclear power plants run on uranium. Uranium is produced during the merging of neutron stars. So nuclear=solar.

    Should we just say that all energy is solar? Or maybe we can just agree on some high-level categories to help differentiate between different concepts to make discussing them less confusing?

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      No, wind gets a pass because it is literally just recovering solar energy from the planet being heated by the sun. So it’s solar energy. There are no chemical steps involved to get to the energy and it’s renewable. When did I say that we shouldn’t have high level categories to help differentiate between concepts? I only said that I believe wind should be considered solar energy because it is. The other types you’re referring to are many steps removed from just plain old energy transfer.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Idk. Differentiating between physics and chemistry is kind of problematic. That turns solar, wind, geothermal and hydro into solar. But biomass for example is exempt since that one might grow plants with the sun but then uses chemistry. Likely entire photosynthesis doesn’t count. Also charging EVs with solar, and some forms of storage magically turn the energy into non-solar due to the chemical batteries. (Same with hydrogen/fuel cells.) And it’s debatable whether chemistry isn’t just physics to begin with, as the distinction is fairly arbitrary…