• entwine@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      As a former glasshole, I’m being retraumatized all over again.

      Google Glass did nothing wrong!

      • eltrain123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Their crime was being 13 years early. They had a post-privacy business model in an environment where people still had a choice.

        • entwine@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Nah, nobody gave a shit about privacy back then, just like they don’t give a shit about it today. The problem was just that most people “understood” what spy glasses were because they’d seen them in movies, and the media just stoked the flames of controversy because it led to easy clicks.

          Walking into a public bathroom with glasses like that on your face seems creepier than walking in with a phone in your hand, even though it’s much easier to discretely record with the phone (and in much higher quality).

          Although Meta’s case is different. If I see someone with those glasses on, I may give the individual the benefit of the doubt and trust that they’re not recording me, but I sure as shit am not giving Meta the benefit of the doubt and trusting that they’re not going to record without the user’s knowledge/consent. They wouldn’t let a chance to capture free data pass them by.