Above is a typical sample of what’s been filling my inbox, all day every day. The emailers first ask me for reasoned dialogue—then, if I respond, they hit me with this stuff. I’m …
Apparently we get a shout-out? Sharing this brings me no joy, and I am sorry for inflicting it upon you.
if anyone from here did then they’re fucking banned, but I need better evidence than none and a standard for anti-Semitism that doesn’t include views that are just anti-Zionist and anti-genocide with no hatred behind them
Someone claiming to be the “cartoon guy” showed up at Woit’s blog to explain himself. He’s an edgelord Reddit atheist, the type that we’d ban tout de suite after he leaves one slur-filled comment that we delete.
I hope no-one here emailed him, more in a “don’t debate fascists” way and also a “it’s a waste of time anyway, Saa is set in his ways and is probably unable to be deprogrammed” way.
He named the file after Woit, so either he was trying to be cute re naming, or he made this himself. Which is a wtf discovery. No idea why he doesnt just show emails.
The naming itself is already hitting the libel part. Imho.
E: he reacted on peters blog, scott named it, but it came from an email (and he calls the emailer “peters fan”).
if anyone from here did then they’re fucking banned, but I need better evidence than none and a standard for anti-Semitism that doesn’t include views that are just anti-Zionist and anti-genocide with no hatred behind them
Someone claiming to be the “cartoon guy” showed up at Woit’s blog to explain himself. He’s an edgelord Reddit atheist, the type that we’d ban tout de suite after he leaves one slur-filled comment that we delete.
I hope no-one here emailed him, more in a “don’t debate fascists” way and also a “it’s a waste of time anyway, Saa is set in his ways and is probably unable to be deprogrammed” way.
He named the file after Woit, so either he was trying to be cute re naming, or he made this himself. Which is a wtf discovery. No idea why he doesnt just show emails.
The naming itself is already hitting the libel part. Imho.
E: he reacted on peters blog, scott named it, but it came from an email (and he calls the emailer “peters fan”).