• swlabr@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’m midway through this and this part stood out to me, this is part of the email that was written by S.Al, edited for length:

    Compare RationalWiki and the neoreactionaries. […] Almost nothing they say is outrageously wrong, but almost nothing they say is especially educational to someone who is smart enough to have already figured out that homeopathy doesn’t work […] they fit exactly into my existing worldview without teaching me anything new

    The Neoreactionaries provide a vast stream of garbage with occasional nuggets of absolute gold in them. Despite considering myself pretty smart and clueful, I constantly learn new and important things […] from the Reactionaries. Anything that gives you a constant stream of very important new insights is something you grab as tight as you can and never let go of.

    The garbage doesn’t matter because I can tune it out.

    “Rational Wiki presents an understanding of reality that I mostly agree with and is thus boring. I want some spicy takes so I’m going to go suck on the firehose of reactionary diarrhoea, but it’s ok because my throat game is too good to let any of it through” type shit

    • Evinceo@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      “Rational Wiki presents an understanding of reality that I mostly agree with and is thus boring. I want some spicy takes so I’m going to go suck on the firehose of reactionary diarrhoea, but it’s ok because my throat game is too good to let any of it through” type shit

      All time banger