When having to admit their fault the moderator started looking for arbitrary reasons to ban me. Such as not using the exact terminology of the Amnesty report. Which does not call it genocide.
The moderator is also watching user votes, and calling out people not voting with him.
no, it’s based on religion. that’s obvious, china is well known for suppressing religious movements that might oppose the state. what’s your point here, because that’s no different than someone saying that water feels wet.
Well, aren’t you a radical Islamist, being so supportive of Hamas? Don’t you take issue with the persecution of Muslims in China?
I’m an atheist. But of course I take issue with it. China is one of the worst countries on earth for human rights abuses.
But that ain’t the point. The point is you misrepresented what they said. What I take issue with isn’t part of the debate.
An atheist hamas supporter, a nice chickens for KFC moment, but that’s the standard.
How much do you think religion plays into the conflict for both Israel and Hamas, and more importantly, would secularism help?
Not really any different than an atheist supporting the United States.
As for the second part of your question, that’s a very interesting question that would require a longer, thought out answer, but since I’m on mobile and about to eat, allow me to shorten it a lot to say yes.
And how would you implement that? Moreover, how will you convince them?