When having to admit their fault the moderator started looking for arbitrary reasons to ban me. Such as not using the exact terminology of the Amnesty report. Which does not call it genocide.


The moderator is also watching user votes, and calling out people not voting with him.

    • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Wtf is this, a tankie purity test? With respect to Myanmar, yes. But in general, much less so than any other superpower. They have used economic imperialism quite a bit, as have all economic superpowers, but that’s quite different compared to literally colonizing countries like nearly every Western state has done. They have also supported Russia’s imperialist invasion of Ukraine, So my qualified answer is yes to some degree, but I definitely wouldn’t say imperialism is one of their defining characteristics, particularly when you look at the scale of their imperialist characteristics compared to basically any western state. What they are though is highly authoritarian towards their own people, and as an anarchist that’s what I find most problematic about the Chinese state.

          • goat@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            So what are you going to do about this community’s brigading and about the tankies within this thread? Last time I checked, denying rapes and being openly supportive of Hamas isn’t an anarchist position. It’s also a violation of the code of conduct, so I wonder why you haven’t taken moderator action yet.

            • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Lol are you talking about cryptagion, one of the most vocal tankie haters on our instance? Yep, definitely a tankie because [checks notes] he supports Hamas in their struggle against their warmongering neighbour and refutes obvious Israeli war propaganda? Sure bro, keep stretching the definition of what a tankie is.

              • goat@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                No, diva, cowbee and OP. All of which are self-proclaimed tankies

                Though it is quite alarming to see anarchists supportive of Hamas and the atrocities that were carried out during the 7th of October massacres, killing upwards of 1200 innocents. Would’ve figured the death of innocents is always bad regardless of who they are.

                But let’s shelf that for now and focus on the brigading and how this community seems to have lost it’s purpose, which is discussing whether or not a ban was justified, not about the views of the moderator.

                • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Would’ve figured the death of innocents is always bad regardless of who they are.

                  It is always bad, nobody is arguing otherwise.

                  But let’s shelf that for now and focus on the brigading and how this community seems to have lost it’s purpose, which is discussing whether or not a ban was justified, not about the views of the moderator.

                  What’s your definition of brigading? Is it when nobody agrees with you?