• hissing meerkat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    A democrat who does awful things and “aspire[s] to be Ronald Reagan”. That’s not a democratic or liberal candidate. It’s a conservative take-over of the democratic party.

    • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a conservative take-over of the democratic party.

      I mean… that already happened like 30 years ago. After Walter Mondale got so thoroughly trounced by Reagan in 84, the DNC started looking for their own Reagan. It took a few years to cultivate the right candidate, but Bill Clinton is ultimately who they chose.

      People forget just how conservative he was because his famous sex scandal has crowded out any historical memory of his policy positions, but really the only difference between Clinton and Reagan is that Clinton balanced that budget. He was extremely conservative compared to contemporary democrats, but he was “folksy” and had the right kind of charisma to attract middle America. For Christ sake, the guy won Kentucky in both 92 and 96.