• Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I am only on my phone when I am in a situation where I can’t do anything productive. I don’t even have Facebook installed on my phone, and I need to open web browser to access it.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      On the other link aggregation website, there is a subreddit “PORTUGALCYKABLYAT” full of maps where Portugal has more statistical similarities to Eastern European countries than ones geographically closer to it. I can’t be bothered to check if we have a federated version of that yet.

  • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    As it skews towards the east and north, with Portugal as an exception, would this be due to daylight hours and indoor activities? Combined with relative wealth as other devices could be used in wealthier countries. PCs, tablets etc.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      It really is odd that it seems to correlate so well with longitude. I can’t think of anything that would actually be a causal link there

      I think you’re on to something with wealth playing a factor. It would explain Greece and Portugal being outliers in their regions, at least

      I’m curious to know why Denmark is so unusual. Normally the Nordic countries see pretty similar results on this sort of thing, but Denmark compared to Norway or Sweden is a wider gap than almost any other neighbouring pair

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Although doesn’t explain Ireland vs UK which are quite similar in culture and activities. Ireland is now more wealthy, but I’d expect secondary device ownership to be similar as the discrepancy is small and media consumption very similar due to similar cultures.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is the screen time needed when you wake up to catch up on everything and get out of bed… Right?

  • Wolf314159@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Are these ratios of hours online in a day (3:11 implies 3 out of 11 hours) online per day? That seems unlikely given how difficult comparisons like that would be to make.

    That leaves the other option that these “hours” are actually hours and minutes (hours:minutes). But, that option is almost as bad simply because then the map subtitle has lied to us through omission in not mentioning minutes.

    This map should have either just shown the number of total minutes or shown the hours in decimal rounded to a sane number of significant digits. Making a distinction of a minute or three amongst such broadly general averages of almost certainly guesstimated numbers self reported in a survey seems a poor choice.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Is using a colon to separate hours and minutes not standard practice were you are? It is in keeping with ISO 8601, at least

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The point is that those are 2 separate and distinct units. I’m not saying it’s not a valid representation of time. I’m say the units in this case are actually hours and minutes, not only hours. It is compounded by the fact that the title is talking about time in a way that is ultimately also a ratio (something a colon is also used to represent), the ratio of hours on the device to the hours in a day. There were many other ways to represent this data that would have been less ambiguous, more clearly showing real differences at a glance, and paying attention to using more appropriate significant digits.

        This place should be called mapshitposting for how often actual map enthusiasts get voted down for pointing out amateur mapping and statistical blunders here.