• dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Correct. And the only choice from then is to continue deplatforming them even further. Bigots and abusers don’t deserve to have a voice

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      But I don’t understand why don’t they go after the abusers, instead of imposing a fine to the platform. This looks like a criminal case, it’s not just a matter that should be left in the hands of the platform to begin with… so why focus on blaming the platform?

      Someone got bullied so hard they died, and the response is to simply ban them and then punish the platform? It sounds like an approach designed by lawyers who just want to make money, instead of actually an attempt to fix/correct the problem.

      It’s like blaming the email provider for allowing the exchange of messages and video files in a mailing group that was organizing crime… instead of actually investigating the people who committed the crime and enacting laws / setting precedent that could act as deterrent, independently of which channel was used while committing the crime. Then punish the platform if they are not collaborating or if they are found to be complicit (while investigating the criminals).