Anon is very obviously describing a prostitute who lives somewhere where it is illegal and thus advertising with innuendo. Anon was turned down by a prostitute. Also the only one calling women whores was you.
i hang out with a lot of freaks. my late partner was an escort, and she wouldn’t take your money and then just not perform she’d just refuse your money. her shitty friend would go lock herself in the bathroom for the whole hour though, and after a while she quit getting clients.
assuming she’s a prostitute he paid at the beginning of the “session”, and he mentions the session ends. her advertised rate is $200. she took his $200 that was implied to be for a service and anon did not recieve said service. anon was robbed. i don’t understand why this is a “wild” idea.
my take was that he hired an energy healer that also posts about kink, she politely snarked at him when he tried to explicitly buy sex, and it went over his head. also as i was typing this i realized it doesn’t really have to be either/or and maybe something went over my head as well.
assuming she’s a prostitute he paid at the beginning of the “session”
This is a wild take though. He paid $200 to ‘release tension, whatever that was’ and was ‘hoping it goes somewhere’. She declined the $600 for a ‘happy ending’.
What he described was closer to going to a massage parlor and having them decline a happy ending, but still giving the normal massage.
ya that’s what that last sentence is about, the whole conversation i was thinking about my late partner’s escort services and it clicked while i was typing that it could be what you describe just woo woo shit instead of massage. im slow sometimes lol.
well, it’s p clear anon thinks she’s a prostitute. this comment chain started with my observation that perhaps she isn’t one, and you chimed in where i was going back and forth with someone who agrees with anon and believes she is a prostitute. why are you shooting off your mouth about people saying wIlD tHiNgS and “correcting” people when you clearly haven’t bothered to understand any part of the post or the conversation?
Anon is very obviously describing a prostitute who lives somewhere where it is illegal and thus advertising with innuendo. Anon was turned down by a prostitute. Also the only one calling women whores was you.
Removed by mod
this is a possibility but it sounds more to me like he misunderstood a witchy tiktoker who also likes bdsm, which is VERY common in occult-y circles
if she’s a prostitute then no anon wasn’t “turned down”, anon was robbed.
nah but thanks for letting me know you’re upset for some weird reason
You’re fucking wild dude
i hang out with a lot of freaks. my late partner was an escort, and she wouldn’t take your money and then just not perform she’d just refuse your money. her shitty friend would go lock herself in the bathroom for the whole hour though, and after a while she quit getting clients.
You lost me here. What a wild thing to say.
assuming she’s a prostitute he paid at the beginning of the “session”, and he mentions the session ends. her advertised rate is $200. she took his $200 that was implied to be for a service and anon did not recieve said service. anon was robbed. i don’t understand why this is a “wild” idea.
my take was that he hired an energy healer that also posts about kink, she politely snarked at him when he tried to explicitly buy sex, and it went over his head. also as i was typing this i realized it doesn’t really have to be either/or and maybe something went over my head as well.
This is a wild take though. He paid $200 to ‘release tension, whatever that was’ and was ‘hoping it goes somewhere’. She declined the $600 for a ‘happy ending’.
What he described was closer to going to a massage parlor and having them decline a happy ending, but still giving the normal massage.
ya that’s what that last sentence is about, the whole conversation i was thinking about my late partner’s escort services and it clicked while i was typing that it could be what you describe just woo woo shit instead of massage. im slow sometimes lol.
Nothing about this post implies she’s a prostitute.
well, it’s p clear anon thinks she’s a prostitute. this comment chain started with my observation that perhaps she isn’t one, and you chimed in where i was going back and forth with someone who agrees with anon and believes she is a prostitute. why are you shooting off your mouth about people saying wIlD tHiNgS and “correcting” people when you clearly haven’t bothered to understand any part of the post or the conversation?