Comments

Republished here, as AI content is in the Public Domain. References are available in the original article.

Frustrated by rising subscription costs and fragmented content availability, viewers worldwide are returning to piracy at unprecedented levels, reversing years of progress made by affordable streaming services. Recent data from London-based monitoring firm MUSO shows piracy visits skyrocketed from 130 billion in 2020 to 216 billion by 2024, with the industry facing projected losses exceeding $113 billion.

Subscription Fatigue Drives Digital Exodus

The streaming landscape has transformed from Netflix’s early promise of “everything in one place” into what critics call “Cable 2.0”—a fractured ecosystem requiring multiple subscriptions. According to The Guardian, the average European household now spends close to €700 annually on three or more video-on-demand subscriptions. With Netflix’s standard plan reaching $15.49 monthly and competitors following suit, consumers are increasingly viewing piracy as a rational alternative.

“Piracy is not a pricing issue, it’s a service issue,” Valve co-founder Gabe Newell observed in 2011—a prediction that appears prophetic as streaming platforms struggle with content fragmentation and rising prices. In Sweden, birthplace of both Spotify and The Pirate Bay, 25% of people surveyed admitted to pirating content in 2024, predominantly driven by those aged 15 to 24.

Content Wars Create Consumer Casualties

The fragmentation crisis has worsened as studios create exclusive content silos. Viewers face scenarios where favorite shows vanish from one platform only to appear on another, or require separate purchases despite existing subscriptions. Even purchased content can become unavailable due to licensing disputes, prompting consumer lawsuits against platforms like Amazon Prime Video.

MUSO data reveals that unlicensed streaming now accounts for 96% of all TV and film piracy, representing a fundamental shift in how content theft occurs. Modern pirates leverage sophisticated tools including AI-driven search engines and encrypted networks that adapt faster than anti-piracy measures can respond.

Industry Scrambles for Solutions

Streaming executives are experimenting with bundled offerings and cracking down on password sharing, but these measures often backfire by further alienating users. According to Antenna research, one-quarter of U.S. streamers are “chronic churners,” frequently canceling subscriptions due to cost and frustration.

The resurgence marks a stark reversal from the mid-2010s when convenient, affordable streaming services nearly eliminated piracy. As one industry analyst noted, studios have created “artificial scarcity in a digital world that promised abundance”, suggesting that without addressing core affordability and access issues, the piracy revival may continue reshaping entertainment consumption patterns.

  • TheMightyCat@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Streaming services really have become the poster child of enshittifcation. My last experience with netflix:

    • Resolution seems a bit blurry
    • hmmm ok maybe it set to 720p
    • Open the settings, options are high, auto, and data saver.
    • Whatever happend to just selecting the resolution?
    • Have to search on reddit for some obscure key combination that opens the debug menu
    • shows 720p
    • opens first support ticket
    • support agent says to contact “the manufacturer of my device”, upon asking with “the manufacturer of my device” (pc) if he means intel, nvdia, or asus he just says “whoever made your device” and closes the ticket
    • open second support ticket
    • after some useless back and forth they eventually send an obscure netflix support article that full hd and above is not supported on linux
    • immediately cancel because as a paying customer you get a worse experiance then the pirates who get 4k with no issues

    And netflix is “generous” to give 720p, i think disney plus maxes out at 360p without DRM, atleast that’s what it looks like because they also use vague terms like “high” and don’t have a resolution setting.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s because they don’t make or support their own apps. 99% of streaming apps are made by the manufacturer of the device you’re using them on (smart tv, one of those streaming boxes) and then the streaming company kicks support to that company (which likely also has dogshit support that sucks) as they ultimately created the app (as cheaply as possible.

      If you’re watching via the web app/browser that actually is made by netflix or whoever but their support is so primed for people never using that. Even if you do use it if you aren’t using latest chrome/win11 they will 100% blame all your issues on that every time.

      As for the simplified settings welcome to the modern era of tech. “Power users” are bad, knowing what you’re doing is bad, having a clue is bad. Computers have to completely stupid now. It’s fine if it’s that way front facing, my mom and my partner don’t give a shit about terms like uhd and raytracing. They are fine with “better” and “auto”. But I would rather set the resolution manually on my gigabit connection and know what it is.

      A mix of kodi, jellyfin, iptv, and navidrome for me. I have adfree youtube with sponsor block as well but that breaks a lot lately, google is aggressive, looking into peertube

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Companies should be required by law to provide support. Following a dumb script and closing tickets because it’s an actual bug on their side instead of a user problem should be treated as a breach of contract.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      This seems like a strange example of enshittification to me because unless I am mistaken, this is just always how Netflix worked.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Netflix new UI is horrible who thought that was an improvement.

      • beetus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Lol yeah. Most people see the limited catalogs and rising prices as enshittification. The quirks of video quality and bandwidth may qualify, but it’s a weird hill to highlight as a prime example