As found by @gerikson here, more from the anti anti TESCREAL crowd. How the antis are actually R9PRESENTATIONALism. Ottokar expanded on their idea in a blog post.
I have not read the bigger blog post yet btw, just assumed it would be sneerable and posted it here for everyone’s amusement. Learn about your own true motives today. (This could be a troll of course, boy does he drop a lot of names and thinks that is enough to link things).
E: alternative title: Ideological Turing Test, a critical failure
I attempted a point by point sneer, but there is a bit too much silliness and not enough cohesion to produce something readable.
So focusing on “Post-critique”:
OP misspels of some of his “enemy” authors, in a way directly cribbed from Wikipedia suggesting no real analysis.
Ricouer should be Ricœur or at the very least Ricoeur. (Incidentally OP also makes a very poor summary of his work)
Complete and arbitrary marriage of epistemic post-critique and literary post-critique, which as far as I can see have nothing to do with each other beyond sharing a name, and in fact even seem a bit at odds with each other in how they relate to recontextualisation.
I would say this is obviously bot vomit, but I have known humans to be this lazy and thickheaded.
Yeah also noticed that, in what little actual arguments there are between the name-dropping, he seems to use some terms in the wrong order in a weird way. And cery likely a bot/troll, but very funny of serious. Do not have a substack account, so couldn’t check if he posted more on the subject. As substack now loginwalls the archives.