- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
A specific road use tax on EVs and hybrids makes no sense.
Given the harms caused by traditional vehicles, society should welcome the decline in fuel excise revenue caused by the transition to EVs – in the same way we should welcome declining revenue from cigarette taxes.
Vehicle registration fees make only a modest contribution to road costs. That’s why all motorists should pay a road-user charge. The payment should be based on a combination of vehicle mass and distance travelled
Isn’t the EV tax effectively just a fuel excise tax for cars that don’t use fuel? I mean, regardless of what this article thinks the fuel excise is described as “a sales tax on fuel that is reinvested into roads”.
As the article points out, the fuel excise tax does not pay for roads, it goes into general revenue and does not collect enough to pay for the damage done by air pollution. The argument is that roads should be paid for by a tax on vehicle weight and distance travelled whether ICE or EV in addition to the fuel excise tax.
That’s what it is presented as. It functions as a disincentive against EVs
Though vehicles overall should be paying enough to pay for their infrastructure, I’d like that to be entirely borne by fossil fuel vehicles to move the balance of vehicles towards the quieter and less polluting
Don’t discriminate against the poor.
The environment is better off with improved public transport rather than EV’s anyhow.
The original vehicle that you don’t need to drive is Mass Transit.
There is no such thing as a safe Self Driving Car.