• squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    But it’s also illegal to be drunk in public

    If you live in a puritanic theocracy, then this is true.

    We already have requirements for motorized vehicles and the whole purpose of the max speed on the bikes is so that they aren’t considered mopeds which have had regulatory requirements for decades

    Look up why moped regulations (including speed limiters and speed limits) were introduced.

    It was done because car lobbyists wanted to make sure that mopeds sucked bad enough that people would continue to buy cars instead of smaller, lower power vehicles.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Your argument might make sense if there wasn’t the higher power powered motorcycles without regulation…

      Motorcycle- no max speed or horsepower and requires maximum amount of regulations

      Moped - less horsepower and less regulations

      Motorized bicycle - even lower hp/speed with minimal regulations

      Companies keep trying to blur the lines between motorized bicycles and mopeds instead of giving Americans the usable commuter mopeds that exist in other countries like India.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        usable commuter mopeds

        You’re talking about 125cc bikes like Honda Airblade, Wave or Activa, that do 55mph stock?

        Those are the exact things that blur the line between scooter and motorcycle. IMO the american equivalent would need to go a bit faster to be safe on highways.

    • Hobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Look up why moped regulations (including speed limiters and speed limits) were introduced.

      It was done because car lobbyists wanted to make sure that mopeds sucked bad enough that people would continue to buy cars instead of smaller, lower power vehicles.

      Do you have a source for this claim? I tried to look it up but just got the justification (to keep them under the motorcycle classification). I don’t really doubt you but verification would be nice.