European search engines Qwant and Ecosia said on Wednesday that they have both started serving search queries through an index they developed together, Staan, that aims to be a cheaper, more privacy-focused alternative to Google and Bing.
EU can’t be in a technological disadvantage when it comes to AI. Of course it wants to make it possible for European AI devs to have support, like a search index that also conveniently has the potential of favoring information that aligns with EU interests.
EU can’t be in a technological disadvantage when it comes to AI.
I think we might be at an impasse as “AI” currently seems to be a solution looking for a problem as far as I can see. Not that LLMs are completely worthless but the “hoover up the internet and hope something useful comes from it” approach seems to be a bit of a technological cul-de-sac that I think the EU would be better off ignoring. Let the other nations spaff money and resources on it, learn from their mistakes, then make a move. We’re long past first-mover advantage after all, so we’d only be playing catch-up. Why not just wait a bit and leapfrog?
You could be very right but I doubt powers that be want to take that chance. That said, I do consider AI dangerous in the world of information warfare.
I’ve not found them reliably useful in a personal or professional capacity for anything other than trivial tasks. I’ve spent a lot of time reviewing code written by LLMs and it was not a good use of my time.
A technology that is inherently unreliable and requires constant supervision needs to be on the level of nuclear fission to be worth the hassle, in my view.
Note that I specifically am talking about “hoover up the internet” LLMs, not specialist tools built on scientific datasets or whatever.
It can summarise my email? Fantastic, except it cannot be relied on to do a good job so I might as well do the reading myself as at least that way the data I’m getting is correct.
search has been using ai under the hood for many years, long before llms came along. that’s why google has had so much ai research, even back in like 2012. it’s one of the best ways to keep track of that much data.
like it or not the field is very useful, llms are just a rather stupid user-facing part.
Can’t afford to set fire to large piles of money?
I’m being slightly flippant but I don’t really understand what you meant by that.
EU can’t be in a technological disadvantage when it comes to AI. Of course it wants to make it possible for European AI devs to have support, like a search index that also conveniently has the potential of favoring information that aligns with EU interests.
I think we might be at an impasse as “AI” currently seems to be a solution looking for a problem as far as I can see. Not that LLMs are completely worthless but the “hoover up the internet and hope something useful comes from it” approach seems to be a bit of a technological cul-de-sac that I think the EU would be better off ignoring. Let the other nations spaff money and resources on it, learn from their mistakes, then make a move. We’re long past first-mover advantage after all, so we’d only be playing catch-up. Why not just wait a bit and leapfrog?
You could be very right but I doubt powers that be want to take that chance. That said, I do consider AI dangerous in the world of information warfare.
You’re saying that currently AI does not help with anything?
I’ve not found them reliably useful in a personal or professional capacity for anything other than trivial tasks. I’ve spent a lot of time reviewing code written by LLMs and it was not a good use of my time.
A technology that is inherently unreliable and requires constant supervision needs to be on the level of nuclear fission to be worth the hassle, in my view.
Note that I specifically am talking about “hoover up the internet” LLMs, not specialist tools built on scientific datasets or whatever.
It can summarise my email? Fantastic, except it cannot be relied on to do a good job so I might as well do the reading myself as at least that way the data I’m getting is correct.
deleted by creator PIEFED
Sigh, no, I just didn’t feel like writing more of an essay. Presume away though because we’re done here.
Do you still see my post? I deleted it 7 hours ago?
edit: why does this lemmy software fuckin suck so much 😡
edit2:
but this worked what
search has been using ai under the hood for many years, long before llms came along. that’s why google has had so much ai research, even back in like 2012. it’s one of the best ways to keep track of that much data.
like it or not the field is very useful, llms are just a rather stupid user-facing part.
Hey if they’re actually useful then that’s fine! The useful stuff hasn’t really been what the AI bros have been pushing in recent years.
no, that’s fair. we usually don’t see the useful stuff because it doesn’t need hype and just shows up as a data point.
And this is why Lemmy is better than Reddit. Not everything has to be a knife fight 😆
as long as we’re not in a knife fighting kinda community, or i manage to make the mistake of criticising north korea again… then yeah