• klemptor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Discovery was legitimately awful in many ways, but not because it was progressive. It was awful because the writing was trash, it over-used CGI in many ways, including breaking canon with holographic interfaces, ruined the fucking Klingons, had a constant melodramatic after-school special vibe in which characters were constantly stopping in the middle of an emergency to talk about their feelings and kumbaya-cry it out…I could go on.

    But one thing I thought Discovery got right was the relationship between Stamets and Culber. It felt natural and lived-in, and I was really happy to see that. Because representation matters!

    • MajesticTechie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      had a constant melodramatic after-school special vibe in which characters were constantly stopping in the middle of an emergency to talk about their feelings and kumbaya-cry it out

      Nail on the head.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Honestly I don’t think it was any of those, really. Not that I’m dismissing them, but I don’t think they were the central issue.

      It was just cheap action fantasy disguised as Star Trek, without really the spirit of Trek. It was individualistic and character-centric, as opposed to the classic TNG vibe of a family and an adventure that just happens on you while you’re trying to just do peaceful exploration.

      That’s what SNW works so well, it abides by the traditional formula.