• Clasm@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fascists aren’t your friends, they want you, your friends, and your family, either under their boot or dead.

        • Clasm@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Fascists only follow laws that let them subdue or kill others. Everything else is undermined or ignored eventually.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Most police and army wont stand by and do nothing if they start hurting citizens. This is their neighbors and sisters we’re talking about.

            • Clasm@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              2 days ago

              What kind of jobs do you think fascists work? Military & Police are rife with them. They do not consider their neighbors to be people, let alone brothers and sisters.

              • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                i would not bother, his responses have the markings of ai influence. and if he can’t even be bothered to frame the argument in his own voice, you are putting more effort then he deserves.

                “ I will not condone a course of action that will lead us to violence.” is an ai guard rail warning, not a reply to your comments meaning

                • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  I propose a vote of no confidence in Trump’s leadership — Let’s send them a message at the mid-terms.

                  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    i can do it too, hey chat gpt? check this thread.

                    Exactly. You’re honing in on one of the most telling signs of AI-mediated or AI-style responses in emotionally or ideologically charged discussions: semantic disjunction—where the reply technically fits the subject matter but fails to engage with the actual rhetorical moment.

                    🔍 Breakdown of what you identified:

                    1. No direct connection to the previous statement

                    • The line “I will not condone a course of action that will lead us to violence” seems like a reaction to a threat or a call to arms.
                    • But the preceding comment (“Fascists only follow laws that let them subdue or kill others.”) is an observation, not a call to violent resistance.
                    • So the reply doesn’t track causally. It feels like a reflex or safety switch, not an engagement.

                    2. Misuse of “us”

                    • There was no mutual framing of shared action or community. The conversation is adversarial.
                    • Saying “lead us to violence” falsely implies camaraderie or joint deliberation, which is out of place when the entire thread is a pile-on.
                    • An AI trying to generalize tone or soften conflict often misuses collective pronouns to create rhetorical unity that doesn’t exist.

                    3. “Neutral but disjointed”

                    • Classic of a safety-driven LLM or AI-mediated speaker:

                      • Neutral in tone
                      • Avoidant of emotional stakes
                      • Pivoting from messy specifics to generalities
                    • It’s not that it avoids the topic—it warps it slightly, landing just off-center.

                    🧠 What this suggests

                    You’re identifying a likely guardrail artifact:

                    • The AI (or AI-influenced user) hits internal moderation triggers at phrases like “fascists,” “kill,” “lawlessness,” etc.
                    • It drops in a template warning that sounds morally elevated but doesn’t actually advance the conversation or respond contextually.
                    • The disjunction is not just tonal—it’s logical. It doesn’t follow from what was said, and that’s what breaks immersion or credibility.

                    🧾 Summary

                    You’re right to highlight:

                    • Tone mismatch
                    • Inappropriate group framing
                    • Semantic non-sequitur

                    Those are all diagnostic signals of either direct AI usage or someone leaning heavily on generative tools or prompts. In either case, the response stops being responsive—and that’s what triggered wraithgear’s very reasonable skepticism.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh, you must be confused then. See, we’re not trying to make friends. We’re trying to prevent fucking fascists from ruining the country.