Like use a cheap brown paper bag and stick the label on that. Cheaper and much less plastic waste. If I wanted a pill bottle, I can buy my own.

  • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    Kids man. Kids will get into everything. The pill bottle is supposed to slow them down.

    • bacon_pdp@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      They sell bottles with time locks and those that require keys.

      Much safer than the push down screw type

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Are you asking because you want to see less plastic or you have issues with a saftey cap that doesn’t require a key?

        • bacon_pdp@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          The bottles my pharmacy uses are terrible. I literally just dump the contents into a different container; otherwise it would be impossible for me to get them out one at a time.

            • bacon_pdp@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Are you perhaps thinking of the packaging directly from the manufacturer and not the containers that the pharmacist uses to dole out medication to multiple customers?

                • bacon_pdp@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Well I am familiar with the concept; I don’t know what the exact constraints that exist beyond the basic chemistry of the medicines themselves and what would help them remain safe and stable. With a little bit of knowledge about mechanical design criteria for human usage. Do you perhaps know of any constraints beyond those?

  • philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Moisture was already noted,but also UV light (brown paper bags are far less UV resistant than you think) and oxygenation is an issue. Even bottles aren’t that good, actually. Blisters are actually better, but even a bit more wasteful.

    • bacon_pdp@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      But pharmacists tend to do batch processing of prescriptions and I don’t want an undue burden to make their lives harder.

  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    You know…Those capsules and coated tablets are…you know…sensitive to moisture?

    Example: My capsules get soft as soon as they get wet.
    Imagine biting of a gummy bear and then sticking the remaining part on any dry surface. Those capsules can stick better than any gummy bear and they’ll rip apart very easily.

    After all they (some) are just made out of gelatine.

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I get 120 days worth of meds at a time. A paper bag would be destroyed.

    But the option would be good, so that I can reuse the bottle.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is a terrible take because medication takers arent the source of the world’s plastic issues. This take is no different than shaming people into sorting their recycling when it just gets sent to some dump in China anyway and individuals, even en masse are not the drivers of mass pollution. Also people frequently reuse medication bottles to securely store various other things and keep them around indefinitey so they are probably one of the furthest things from “the problem” whatever the heck that problem is

  • Cherry@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Anyone could then tamper. These bottles are there for your safety and for those around you. It allows the product the be tracked in a recall. Regulations are usually there because of stuff like this.

    • bacon_pdp@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Most pharmacies don’t fill prescriptions with tamper evident bottles. Perhaps you are thinking of the containers directly from the manufacturer?

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Agree. Never have received tamper evident packaging from a pharmacy. what’s the point? They’re filled in front of me and handed to me.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yours maybe.
        Mine bottle caps are sealed.
        And the bottle has a aluminium seal on top (and it takes a knife or a pocket knife to puncture that. I tried with a finger. It hurt)

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s almost like once upon a time we put shit in burlap sacks and paper and discovered that it was a moisture magnet. That’s good for pills right? A moist environment? Possibly warm depending on where you store it? That couldn’t possibly have adverse effects to sensitive compounds we ingest.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Guns should also be left in the open for children to play with since we’re on the topic of easy things we can change to threaten the life of those that may not know better yet!

    • bacon_pdp@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why would anyone put a pill bottle (or any other dangerous thing) within grabbing range of a small child?

      • unmagical@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Relying on a small child to stay on the ground in order to not accidentally kill themselves is a great way to end up with a dead kid.

        Furniture should be anchored to a wall, guns locked in safes with the safety enabled and ammo removed, drugs in child resistant packaging locked in a cabinet, drawers and cabinets secured, etc.

        Kids climb stuff, get into things, find things they shouldn’t, AND they emulate what they see their parents do. Putting something out of reach is nowhere near secure enough.

        • bacon_pdp@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          You are correct; child care requires a much more complex subject than just put drugs up.

          Locked medicine cabinets don’t stop kids that figure out lock picking. Two year old children figure out child proof packaging. That is why as a parent you actively care for your children and teach them the why and how of the world.