• ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tell me you’re from the US without telling me you’re from the US. In Europe a 100 year old house isn’t uncommon and isn’t even close to needing to be demolished.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If it’s poorly made… there are houses in Europe that have been continuously owned longer than the USA has existed.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I live in a 121 year old house. it’s doing ok.

      the only problems I have right now is the below sub par contractors that come to work on it.

      any work I’ve had done I have had to go back and repair damages because they did it cheaply or incorrectly.

      point is, it’s not the house that’s wrong, it’s the talent is lacking.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was looking at a 1920s house 15 years ago. Owner said the wood had become so hard over the years he had to buy special drill bits to work on it and nails were mostly out of the question.

      Lived in a 100-yo house in college. It would have been nice if the landlord was dumb to start with then went senile. Looked online last year and it’s still there and all cleaned up!

      I think it was around $30K. That hood exploded and now that house is probably north of $400,000.