Austria’s Foreign Minister Beate Meinl-Reisinger has called for an open discussion on the country’s long-standing neutrality, stating that it no longer guarantees national security in the face of growing geopolitical instability and an increasingly aggressive Russia.
In an interview with Die Welt, Meinl-Reisinger emphasized that neutrality alone does not protect Austria and pointed to the importance of strengthening defense capabilities and deepening international partnerships. “Austria is protected by investment in its own defense capacities and in its partnerships,” she said.
The minister’s remarks follow a proposal by Emil Brix, Director of the Diplomatic Academy of Vienna, suggesting that Austria consider joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Meinl-Reisinger expressed support for a public debate on the issue, acknowledging that the current political and public majority remains opposed to NATO membership.
…
Meinl-Reisinger also addressed Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine, stating that Ukraine seeks peace, while Russia continues its campaign of aggression. She added that if Russian leader Vladimir Putin were genuinely interested in peace, he would have engaged in ceasefire negotiations.
…
Don’t you think it is logical to despise Russia for what it is doing, namely waging a war of aggression to annex a neighboring country and expand its borders in a scale we haven’t seen here since Nazi Germany decided that its neighbouring countries should no longer exist?
If you look through the lense of hybrid warfare, it’s comparatively small, even for ‘here’.
To despise the war itself logically you have to despise other wars and violence in equal proportions, even, or especially if they don’t happen here.
I can’t tell if you do. The limiting of the scope to here makes me think that you are aware of a broader context that would lead you to a different judgement that you want to avoid.
You try to tell me that the war Russia is waging, which forced them to switch to war economy, which forced them to mobilise, which forced them to recruit foreign fighters and weapons from countries such as North Korea or Iran, which has them deploy several hundred thousand soldiers and which has them experienced a six-figure sum of losses, is “comparatively small”?
Do you really?
With a generous definition of hybrid warfare, yes.
Thanks for this honesty. You choose to be generous towards Russia that currently is busy destroying it’s neighbouring country by military force, yet seem to be very upset about Austria wanting to discuss a possible future within NATO. How unmasking! :D
You can’t be that oblivious that you interpret it like that.
You take more offense in Austria considering NATO than in Russia waging war.
I take no direct offence. Both are about politics in which I am not directly involved.
The offence is that the media in general uses the Russian aggression to justify the reduction of civil rights. In this case there is no direct benefit so that the empty argument becomes visible.
You find excuses/explanations for Russia’s actions (war) but don’t accept excuses/explanations for Austria’s actions (NATO). Strange, isn’t it?
Which is neither case nor topic here.
I gave you a clear example for a benefit, hence this point is invalid.