• SuperCub@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, schools (k-12) pretty easily blacklist websites you can access, not sure why parents can’t just do that if they want as well.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Because it was meant as a “soft ban”. First you make it troublesome to access porn, but also blame the providers if kids are circumventing it in any shape or form (no section 230-esque protections). This, alongside with payment processors, act as a chokehold on the industry, and also on the LGBTQIA+ community as a whole if you can read between the lines. The long game is to make it unpopular enough in a few years, that it can be easily outlawed.

    • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The amount of parental controls available now really give parents little to no room for excuses.