• freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      23 hours ago

      A tolerant society can not tolerate intolerance. One side will attempt to “just live”, but the intolerant side is incapable of “letting live”, and they will not stop until they replace tolerance with their system of hate.

    • MrNobody@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sure, but since orgaanised religions can’t help to force others to live by their standards, they need to get out of the way. I’m fine with people needing a comfort measure, even if its in the form of an invisibile friend. Whatever helps people sleep at night. However, when they try to force their ideals down everybody elses throat thats a big no.

      So, since they can’t ‘live and let live’ they need to go the way of the dodo, fuck off, and leave the rest of society alone.

      • Gsus4@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Meh, I consider religions as political movements. When they go crazy fundamentalist, try to take over and become destructive, sure, shut them down.

        But not just based on their future potential to turn destructive, that can happen to any ideology if the conditions are right.

        • Barrymore@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          But what undeniable good thing comes from religion? It’s not just that they have the potential for destruction and hate, it’s that those are the only possible outcomes

            • Barrymore@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              We could get unions, consumer protections, housing and food and other necessities guaranteed. We don’t, but we could. Politics is just trying to solidify how things are run. Obviously easily can be used for abuse, but can be used for good. Religion from the first step is to tell you how bad of a person you are and how to resolve it: join a cult, deny personal responsibility for anything and put that on whatever deity or subject for hate at the time, all your answers should be sought through your religion and not outside sources

              • Gsus4@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                You’re making a lot of value judgements without a whole lot of evidence to back them up. My point is perfect atheist: religious movements are a type of politics with certain aims (not exactly unions, but incidentally communion, charity, etc). It is you who are saying that religion is somehow a special phenomenon who puts them above other ways to organize society…for the worse. Maybe you think that it is because it is irrational and metaphysical. There is plenty of metaphysics in the form of utopias (heaven) in politics, saints/prophets (cult of personality). You just say that bad comes out of religion, but not out of politics…yeah…ok.

                • Barrymore@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Not denying bad comes from politics, especially in regards to the US, clearly we are seeing a lot of awful things that can come from politics, and religion likes to play politics as well. I am and will continue to refuse that religion is capable of producing good will, change for the better, or anything outside of bringing forth hate and destruction

                  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    12 hours ago

                    Depends on who the leaders are. Some Many weaponize religion for their own aims and their ends justify the means. Some are peaceful, tolerant and constructive, all based off the very same texts.