The Trump administration is continuing its dangerous push to surveil and suppress foreign students’ social media activity. The State Department recently announced an unprecedented new requirement that applicants for student and exchange visas must set all social media accounts to “public” for...
  • ltxrtquq@lemmy.mlEnglish
    31·
    7 days ago

    if applicants … don’t maintain a social media presence, the government may interpret it as an attempt to evade the requirement or deliberately hide online activity.

    Presumably it’s disqualifying.

      • ltxrtquq@lemmy.mlEnglish
        31·
        7 days ago

        A separate cable, obtained by multiple news outlets, directed embassies and consulates to vet applicants for “hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles”

        …

        Applicants for student and exchange visas will now have their “entire online presence” vetted, per the cable reportedly said. If students refuse to change their accounts to “public” and “limited access to, or visibility of, online presence could be construed as an effort to evade or hide certain activity.”

        Seems like a reasonable assumption to me

        • refalo@programming.dev
          1·
          7 days ago

          I don’t see how that even implies that not having a presence in the first place is inherently a red flag…

          • ltxrtquq@lemmy.mlEnglish
            1·
            7 days ago

            limited access to, or visibility of, online presence could be construed as an effort to evade or hide certain activity

            Do you really not? Can you not connect the dots between “limited access to, or visibility of, online presence” and not having a social media account? Do you truly not understand how these two things are related?

            • refalo@programming.dev
              11·
              7 days ago

              I understand how people can infer subjective conclusions, but I don’t agree that it objectively says as much.