• magnetosphere @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One thing I absolutely cannot stand is the assumption that if you’re against the Israeli government, you must also be antisemitic. In many cases, nothing could be further from the truth.

    The Israeli government is just as screwed up as any powerful government, and is not immune to criticism. Groundless accusations of antisemitism are often used to unfairly attack critics, distract the listener from valid criticisms, and derail the conversation.

    Of course, many of those accusations are completely justified, which clouds the issue further.

    • mikyopii@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s super tricky and problematic. Organizations like AIPAC have many American politicians in their pocket. They pump a huge amount of money into lobbying our government promoting Israeli interests. But this argument gets awfully close to “the Jews have all the money and control the world” type conspiracy thinking which is very frustrating.

      • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most definitely. Just as pointing out unwarranted accusations of antisemitism can sound like victim blaming, and saying that the Israeli government likes it that way can make you come off as a hateful, insensitive jerk.

        Various world politicians “wrap themselves in the flag” all the time. Israeli politicians do the same thing, but they’ve done an especially good job of weaving religion and patriotism together.

    • YassKwiin@rammy.site
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a tactic to call all criticism antisemitism.

      Hell, the ADL was created to free a rapist murderer and try to frame a black man.

  • PitzNR@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an Israeli I just want to say: Please someone marry me I need that foreign passport to get out of this shithole :(

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because much of US politics at the moment is wedge issues. The leadership of both parties agree that Israel has the right to exist, but there’s a split there too. Democrats have started calling out Israel’s excesses with settlers in the West Bank, extremist right wing politics, and intentional poisoning of any peace process. Meanwhile, Republicans have allied themselves to extremist right wing authoritarian Israel politicians.

        • YassKwiin@rammy.site
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The leadership of both parties agrees that the carrot (donor money etc) and the stick (Epstein type blackmail) works on them.

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s just objectively wrong, but go ahead with the disinformation.

        If we consider the Koran War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the war in Afghanistan and the Iraq War, Trump joins Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, John F. Kennedy and Dwight D. Eisenhower in not having officially brought the United States into a new war since 1945. - Linkhttps://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-modern-us-presidents-new-wa-idUSKBN2A22SN

        • mommykink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fwiw, all he said was that Trump was the first president in his lifetime to not start a new war. If he was born in 2016 or after, this would be correct by default. And judging by the quality of their comment, I wouldn’t put it past them

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unless the person you replied to is almost 70 years old, Eisenhower wasn’t president during their lifetime. They’d have to be over 50 for Nixon to have been, 60 for kennedy, 45 for Ford, 42 for Carter.

          Reagan, Clinton, and Obama are probably the only ones applicable from your list, and “starting new wars” can be applied to a few of them in terms of the USA becoming infolved, as others have mentioned.

        • Chunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Obama involved us in Syria and supported the Saudis bombing Yemen.

          Clinton got involved in the Balkans.

          Reagan funded rebel groups in South America.

          Carter… Actually idk anything this far back.

          You should listen to Noam Chomsky. He’s very very liberal and has some good criticisms of the US involvement overseas. I don’t agree with everything he says but it’s worth listening to.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s your takeaway?

        This would be like watching all of Breaking Bad and saying Walter White was just trying to earn some cash for his family.

        Astounding.

      • yngmnwntr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean he certainly tried to start a civil war, he’s just so yuge of a failure at everything he does he bungled it.

        • masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t care about that. I care about the fact that American soldiers committed fewer murders with Trump as president compared to GWB or Obama as president.

          • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “The other thing with the terrorists is you have to take out their families, when you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families. They care about their lives, don’t kid yourself. When they say they don’t care about their lives, you have to take out their families,” Trump said.

            The Trump administration’s quiet decision this week to roll back part of an Obama-era transparency rule that mandated reporting of civilian casualties from airstrikes has renewed the stark debate over who dies, and how, in U.S. military action abroad.

            —-

            Well its pretty convenient to state that your guy didnt kill anyone if he orders the military and government to stop keeping count, now doesn’t it?

            Thats like saying you arent broke because you refuse to look at your bank account and see those overdraft notices.

      • AnyProgressIsGood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Biden actually pulled us out of Afghanistan. Trump had 4 years and punted. So -1 war count for Biden vs trump almost starting shit with Iran.

        Ya want less war. Bidens your guy. It’s like he had a kid that served

      • Syldon@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        He literally wanted to bomb Mexico. What planet are you from?

        • masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          likewise I don’t care about America’s internal issues. The part I care about is that he killed fewer people than his predecessors.

  • Cyberwitch_7493@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Israel is an apartheid state and fuck that shit. Instead of “Mowing the Lawn” (aka committing genocide by pushing Palestinians out of their homeland) and bombing schools and refugee camps, maybe try socialist policies that lift everyone up. Fuck fascism and fuck racism.

    I realize there’s important nuances I’m overlooking, but I watch enough Democracy Now to know that tiptoeing around or staying silent just gives room for Israel fascists to spread lies based on their feelings, not the truth. This shit’s depressing but fuckin important.

    And don’t take my word for it, check my sources!

    Democracy Now: “Automated Apartheid”: How Israel Uses Facial Recognition to Track Palestinians & Control Movement Understand that no database of a single ethnic or marginalized group has ever had good consequences in history, remember 1930s Germany?

    Democracy Now: From Drone Strikes to Settler Attacks, Israel Intensifies Effort to “Completely Take Over Palestine”

    Democracy Now: Under Fire: Report from Jenin Refugee Camp on Israel’s Largest West Bank Attack in 20 Years

    Democracy Now: “The Palestine Laboratory”: Antony Loewenstein on How Israel Exports the Technology of Occupation

    Jacobin: Israel Created the Refugees in Gaza That They’re Now Bombing

  • PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One party is actively banning books…

    And that’s just the tip of their Christofascist iceberg.

    • whenigrowup356@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Primary for democrats and then yell at them once they’re elected. A lot.

      Politics isn’t a consumption based economy. It doesn’t change until you change it. MAGA people understand this.

      They’re counting on your apathy. Don’t let them.

      • AnyProgressIsGood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Third party is voting for the fascist party. There aren’t enough floating votes for this system for a 3rd party to have a chance

        • azimir@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ranked Choice Voting (fairvote.org) or any other preference polling voting system significantly mitigates that problem.

          Then 3rd party can be a real strength for the political system, not just a weapon to use against your opponents.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      You forgot to barf up the word “ethnostate” right after you barfed up “christofascist”.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you saying they aren’t DOING that very thing?
        Are you saying they AREN’T that very thing?

    • azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Vote better voting first. Any kind of preference polling would open the door to actually party reform and 3rd party viability. Ranked Choice Voting (fairvote.org) or anything other than first past the post as we mostly have now is a huge improvement.then vote 3rd party first, followed by the lesser of the old two evils. In no time that 3rd party will be a top contender, but only once we fix our voting system.

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s generally two types of criticism against both parties.

      • The speaker is centrist and dislikes both equally (enlightened centrism)

      • The speaker is leftist and is criticizing both right wing parties for doing something right wing

      (Right wing critics usually just pretend to be centrist)

  • Flinch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free 🇵🇸🗝️

      • SleepyCat@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel will never willingly give up the land they stole, the core of Zionist ideology is settler colonialism. The high court and the mainstream opposition parties made it clear that they are neither willing to let Jewish people coexist with Palestinians as equals nor dismantle the oppressive Zionist state.

        It is very short-sighted of you to claim that the only way to return land to their rightful owners is by voting for people who explicitly don’t want to do that.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve seen Palestinian crowds chanting “Death to all Jews.” The gangrape of that reporter started by one dude in crowd deciding she’s a Jew and therefore fair game. A flash mob realizing a car is in the wrong neighborhood and immediately trying to kill them. Random rocket attacks on civilians foiled only by tech that costs 100x the weapons it defends against.

      I’m not saying Israel is justified, or they aren’t on their way to outright fascism, or they don’t get some murder and torture in on their own.

      I’m saying violence is a perpetual suffering machine that in this case is too late to solve, but we’re forgetting the British started it all, let’s invade England and execute the monarchy.

      • Bantha@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh I think you misunderstood some things there. I see a israeli security minister that is a straight up a right wing extremist. I see that cars from Palestinians can’t enter certain regions in order for them to not get into the “wrong” neighbourhoods. And most importantly of all I see journalists killed by the IDF. Imagine you are oppressed by a apartheid state that was put onto your land by some imperialistic force, but then expands even further into “your” territorry and surpresses you. I do NOT condone the actions by the Hamas. But when Palestinians see violence as the only way out I can see why.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And now you’re an Israeli who sees a radical Palestinian and says to themselves “well fuck these guys too then.”

          You see how this works? I don’t feel like the cycle of violence is a new observation. I feel like you should already know one side being bad doesn’t make the other good.

          • Bantha@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah thing is that the gov of Israel is the source of the “cycle”. They create facts by building Israeli settlements on Palestinian territories and say “Welp guess you can’t live there any longer”, they commit warcrimes by falsely stating that they won’t attack, then airstrike, keep normal civilian Palestinians in the world’s largest open air prisons and only continue to strengthen their grip on the Palestinian people.

            Israel is the only party that can actually stop the violence. If the Hamas would stop their attacks it wouldn’t mean that the Palestinians will be treated equal to Israelis by the state. That’s like saying Ukrainians should stop defending their territory cuz they only prolong the suffering that way.

            And for most Israelis it’s sadly “fuck the Palestinians” and not “specifically fuck the actually radical Palestinians” thanks to rigorous propaganda.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              When Israel was broadly behaving like they didn’t have a wannabe fascist dictator obsessed with an Israeli Manifest Destiny as PM it didn’t stop Hamas either. Do you think if Netanyahu goes to prison where he belongs they’ll suddenly accept the two state solution?

              Because as it is only Fatah seems willing to accept that, and they’re hemorrhaging support.

      • Titan@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen Palestinian crowds chanting “Death to all Jews.”

        Yeah no shit. That’s a natural reaction to jewish people suddenly invading their country and killing their families. Try harder

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “It’s completely normal to scream for genocide. No, obviously Israel doesn’t get the same benefit in this multi-generational conflict initially caused by outside sources.”

          And you great minds wonder why people assume being anti-Israel is just hidden anti-Semitism lol