• AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Some of those things are pretty double-edged though. I grew up pre-Internet. Today, if a group of friends are standing around and someone says, “I heard that platypus eat bats,” someone will whip out their phone and say that’s bullshit in 30 seconds. Back in the day, we could ride our bikes to the library and find out, or maybe someone’s parents had encyclopedias, but we usually just didn’t care that much. On the other hand, because stuff wasn’t right at our fingertips, we had to reason a lot more things out. I feel like our critical thinking skills were better. Someone was bound to say, “Bats? How would that work? They live in the water and bats fly around eating bugs. I’m not buying it.”

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      And then there were those who had less good critical thinking skills and believed in lots of let’s say interesting things.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yep, those folks have always been around. There was a weird thing when email became widespread. It turns out that there are (at least were) people who will reject a stupid thing if someone says it to them, but will believe the same stupid thing if they see it written. A giant number of early viral emails were things like “According to the New York Times, gangs are targeting people who wear people shoes.” Of course, the NYT never said that, it was all bullshit, but all sorts of people would swear it was true because papers were reporting it.