Considering your unwillingness or inability to read the poll
I read the poll. Did YOU read the poll? You are drawing a lot of conclusions based on the article and your own biases (and not the actual poll) that the data does not support.
I’ve pointed out exactly how it doesn’t logically follow, and your response is to put your fingers in your ears and pretend none of that actually happened.
or parse my arguments
Saying Leftist are “LESS vile ON AVERAGE, but otherwise INDISTINGUISHABLE” is still saying they are vile. Using weasel words like “less” and “on average” doesn’t erase that.
If you find Leftists vile and think you’d be better off suckling the teats of the neolibs- by all means go suck them.
I read the poll. Did YOU read the poll? You are drawing a lot of conclusions based on the article and your own biases (and not the actual poll) that the data does not support.
I’ve pointed out exactly how it doesn’t logically follow, and your response is to put your fingers in your ears and pretend none of that actually happened.
Saying Leftist are “LESS vile ON AVERAGE, but otherwise INDISTINGUISHABLE” is still saying they are vile. Using weasel words like “less” and “on average” doesn’t erase that.
If you find Leftists vile and think you’d be better off suckling the teats of the neolibs- by all means go suck them.