• GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    That is not how it was intended to work. It was never meant to be a high maintenance endeavor. It was meant to be representatively maintained with the constituents in mind.

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I believe that what they’re trying to say is this: keeping a government running requires more than just voting for whoever you think will do a decent job every year or two, because it, ultimately, doesn’t matter what Hamilton, Locke, Madison, De Tocqueville and other influential philosophers of politics might have intended, because any system that is only checked once a year is a fragile system, prone to corruption. It requires constant maintenance, bug fixes, security updates, and independent reviews. It requires not only that every part of it has the light of day cast upon it, but that the people at every level actually look and act on what the light of day reveals.

      Whether you or the framers like it or not, the united states is no longer a representative republic. The people being elected are not representing the people. They are representing corporations, private interests and foreign oligarchs who pay them to give them the sweet meats of the treasury and leaving the ovens untended, but continuing to shovel the coals of our taxes into the ovens, because then they can make their own pies. The US government as it stands is committed to deregulation, to abandonment of all duty, and that laissez-faire attitude is by design, not of the framers or the people, but by the design of the corpocratic interests that have captured the government, media, and every other facet of our lives, including even our private actions and thoughts through a paucity of data privacy.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        And I’m saying I don’t really give a fuck enough about some dumbass theoretics of imaginary lines and laws. I do what I can. I vote. I don’t abuse people. I take of my community by giving back with what little I can. But I’m not going to over extend myself. I did that when I was young and the movement did not succeed. I’m not wasting the rest of my days fighting some dumb shit that is pulled by corporate greed.

        • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          That’s fair. I feel like you might benefit from reading Cloud Atlas. It’s… apropos. That, and A Canticle for Leibowitz have basically formed my worldview since reading them.

          I think that the philosophy can basically be summed up with the quote “You have to do whatever you can’t not do.” For us, that’s raging against the dying of the light. We can’t not. But for some, it’s hard enough just trying to survive and be decent to those around us, and that life is not without virtue. By each crime and every kindness, we birth our future.