• Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Which is why usually there was laws to prevent them from doing whatever they wanted but that’s out the window.

      • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        The sad truth is that the Left could also potentially have a number of gun enthusiasts because nothing is stopping any of them from doing that, but the Democratic party has turned most leftists into pacifists who are afraid of guns and feel that impotent sign waving and finger waggling is enough.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          This is pretty much entirely false. Gun ownership is far from non-existent on the left.

          And frankly, supporting the right to own guns doesn’t give you a right to demand that others do so if they choose not to.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There are a lot of liberal and leftist gun owners, they just don’t wear them as identity or gender affirming care.

          “How do you know if your conservative neighbor bought a new gun?” “Don’t worry he’ll tell you.”

          But more broadly, yes we’ve let the right RUIN the very principles that we could have held onto and come out on top. If we kept guns and the American flag we wouldn’t be in a fascist state right now. I’m not even kidding. We gave them nationalism AND the tools to keep it.

          Fucking soft-ass whinging lefties are still circling around issues of principle when we’re literally losing the entire country. “Oh no, that guy said the R word once! We should make 48-minute essay pieces on youtube calling out their bad behavior while flying the flags of our own particular ethnicity or identity as we retreat to Discord to get emotional comfort from our niche group of parasocial clingers who will never actually challenge us!”

          I am fully aware this is going to piss off some Lemmy users who read it and they will obtusely think that I’m anti-pride or saying that we should use slurs. I’m not saying that (but thank you for proving my point). I’m saying we fixated on the wrong problems instead of attacking the right with actual populist ideas that would have also had a measure of help with issues of equality and human rights. We allowed the right to make it a “bad guys versus good guys” fight when we could have made it a “They’re hurting us all, we all deserve better” fight. We have misjudged with great naivety just how uninvolved and uncaring the average American is about issues outside of their immediate lives, We have tripped up BADLY because our idealism had no wiles or strategy. I guess it was all worthwhile if you can be the most ideologically pure leftist in the camps.

        • InternetRando@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          YES

          They also said we should respect Nazi free speech rights and the religious beliefs of people who disallow doctors to save their children from dying.

            • InternetRando@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I disagree wholeheartedly. The Constitution was there to serve a small population in the early years of the country. The amendments they made and why they made them have very little if anything at all to do with what radical fascist SCOTUS members claimed since then. There’s been years of arguing about this already so I won’t bother with it here but suffice to say that I absolutely reject the notion that violent fascist ideologues have free speech rights unless you can show me that Fox News and OAN are providing prime time slots for socialists and communists. No I do not gove one single fuck about “bUt tHeYrE pRiVaTe cOmPaNiEs!” because private companies have been publicly oppressed for opposing views.

              • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I disagree wholeheartedly.

                You shouldn’t. Freedom of speech does have some limitations but not in the ways you suggest. It’s an integral part of Constitution and this country.

                that Fox News and OAN are providing prime time slots for socialists and communists.

                Just doesn’t make any sense man. Not providing an opposing view isn’t a violation of free speech. People do it constantly.

          • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Honestly, if Republicans/right-wingers want to kill off their own voters by encouraging anti-intellectualism, anti-vax, etc, we should allow them to Darwin Award themselves to extinction. Fuck them; all this leftist empathy and pacifism has allowed fascists to resurge and take over nearly every government across the world.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Law only exists to control those lower in the hierarchy than the ones who hold ruling authority over its enforcement and interpretation.