• NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would have to disagree. Sure, in the modern world, one function of art is to “move money around,” but it’s far from the only function or even the most important function.

      • brambledog@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your favorite painting was likely commissioned by a rich person, and the person who received credit for it probably had most of the work done by an apprentice of theirs.

        Rich people don’t like fine art and wine because they are so much more intellectually advanced than we are, they like them because they are a great tool of the wealthy. These people can’t tell the difference between a $7 wine and their $25,000 wine in a blind taste test, and if you tell them so, they will smile and nod, because the taste isn’t the point.

        Your grandmother’s knit sweaters would be considered fine art if it could be used to launder money.

        • theluddite@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re not wrong but I think you’re making too strong a version of your argument. Many people, including wealthy people, are genuinely, deeply moved by art. I love the symphony, opera, and ballet. If I were rich I’d absolutely commission the shit out of some music and get a lot of real joy out of that.