https://www.parl.ca/documentviewer/en/44-1/bill/C-210/first-reading
Elections Canada research shows most adult voters oppose the measure: “Seven in ten respondents, 72 percent, disagreed.”
https://www.parl.ca/documentviewer/en/44-1/bill/C-210/first-reading
Elections Canada research shows most adult voters oppose the measure: “Seven in ten respondents, 72 percent, disagreed.”
Hm, if I understand you right, you’re saying that there’s there’s a sort of threshold of governance (eg you mention legally being allowed to work, and being required to pay taxes) that, once met, requires that those under such governance must have representation in the government. So, by that logic, would you then be okay with children not being allowed to vote if, say, they weren’t allowed to work, and didn’t have to pay taxes?
If a child is still legally the responsibility of its parents or guardians then the guardians would be responsible for making sure they vote in the best interests of the child. See also what’s happening in America (my country of residence) - a lot of fascists are voting in ways that will directly harm their lives. I could make an argument those decisions harm the children as well.
I feel like the line of questioning is a trying to head down a reductio ad absurdum path…