• thomasloven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Honestly, as a European I dare say most Europeans couldn’t name all 50 states, and definitely not place them on a map.

    I’m confident I could correctly place Texas, Florida, probably California and maybe Kentucky if the borders were drawn.

    Naming more than one or two state capitals? Forget it!

    Edit: quite sure about Alaska and Hawaii too, but I forgot those (see!).

    • wieson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, but the average us-american couldn’t even begin to name the départements of France for example. Or anything on the scale of NUTS1 in Europe or Brazil or China.

      • thomasloven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The individual states are better compared to medium/small European countries than to districts of most countries in terms of size, population, economy and political independence.

        Not being able to place Boise is is more like not being able to place Skopje than Nantes. (And yes, I had to look two of those up)

        • wieson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          California maybe, Nebraska not. Catalunya is more significant than over half of the states. As is northrhine-westfalia.

    • Pandoras_Can_Opener@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Fellow European, seconding this. I can roughly point out Georgia and New York instead of Kentucky and Michigan is easy because of the coast line. I’ve been to the east coast, I couldn’t point out the state I was in to save my live.

      All these straight borders are confusing AF anyway.