• tane@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I mean is allowing Nazi speech not a commitment to free speech, shitty as that may be? I wish both substack and nazis painful deaths but your post doesn’t exactly make sense.

        • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Said the person calling for a group of people to get killed SMH

          That’s what Nazis do.

          • tane@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Said the person with a smooth brain. You want to carry water for right wingers and nazis feel free idiot

            • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Slurp that boot more tankie shithead.

              Let me guess you also own guns that statistically you are more likely to kill yourself with than shoot a Nazi.

              • tane@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Let me guess you’re a worthless shitlib who enables Nazis and hates “tankies” making you literally no better than the former. Oh look I was right

    • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Absolutely not! Free speech is:

      protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States

      It does not mean you get to be a platform of hate mongers and a haven for Nazis.

      if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant, it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance; thereby undermining the very principle of tolerance.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

        • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Yes and here is the Canadian:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_expression_in_Canada

          “reasonable and can be justified in a free and democratic society" Hate speech (which refers to the advocacy and incitement of genocide or violence against a particular defined racial, ethnic, gender, sexual, religious or other identifiable group)

          Nazis are not protected under this one either. See paradox of tolerance.

          “Freedom of speech” covers government censorship of criticism about itself. Nothing more.

          Freedom of speech does not mean you get to platform Nazis without being called a POS and eventually ending up in the Hague.

          Edit: just saw your post about wishing death to all British politicians… yeah they are filth but cut it out with the calls for killing an entire group of people… That’s what Nazis do ffs

          • tane@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Durrr don’t call for the deaths of people who bring death and destitution on others. Shut the fuck up you dumbass lib

              • tane@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                20 hours ago

                From linking basic Wikipedia for “free speech” to “tankie” insults im about to hit worthless shitlib bingo lol