• nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The difference in intent makes sense. The difference in primary function does not, killing a person with a kitchen knife is no better than with a gun.

    The problem with car accidents is that it’s difficult to know the intent of a person, especially carelessness kills a lot more people via cars than via kitchen knifes, and we can’t know for sure when it was an honest mistake by the driver.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah, intent tends to be everything with unfortunate events.

      I can argue that the woman may have fallen down the stairs with her baby on purpose. We can say she didn’t take proper precautions, use the hand rails, ran down/up the stairs, only carry the baby in a safe device like a car seat, or that she simply should not allow the child to risk traversing up/don the stairs.

      With a gun/balcony, the intent was pretty clear. With the stairs/car, they are both presumed accidents.